A stakeholder map is best described as which of the following?

A stakeholder map is best described as which of the following?

• A. A list of stakeholders by department; used to assign project tasks.
• B. A diagram of stakeholders by influence and interest; used to tailor communication and engagement plans.
• C. A timeline of stakeholder meetings; used to track attendance.
• D. A risk map of stakeholders and potential issues.

Answer: (B)

A stakeholder map visualizes stakeholders on a chart by their influence over the project and their level of interest in its outcomes. This arrangement lets you tailor how you communicate and engage with each group: those with high influence and high interest need close, proactive engagement; high influence with lower interest calls for targeted, concise updates; those with high interest but less power benefit from consultation and involvement; while those with lower influence and interest can be monitored with lighter touch. This precise use of influence and interest to guide engagement plans is what the option describes. Other artifacts like a department list, a meeting timeline, or a risk map serve different purposes and don’t organize stakeholders by how much they can affect the project or how invested they are in its outcomes.

A stakeholder map visualizes stakeholders on a chart by their influence over the project and their level of interest in its outcomes. This arrangement lets you tailor how you communicate and engage with each group: those with high influence and high interest need close, proactive engagement; high influence with lower interest calls for targeted, concise updates; those with high interest but less power benefit from consultation and involvement; while those with lower influence and interest can be monitored with lighter touch. This precise use of influence and interest to guide engagement plans is what the option describes. Other artifacts like a department list, a meeting timeline, or a risk map serve different purposes and don’t organize stakeholders by how much they can affect the project or how invested they are in its outcomes.